Scam Report Against @pollymydolly

[58]

Scammers Profile Link: https://cracked.sh/pollymydolly
Sales Thread: https://cracked.sh/Thread-WTS-All-in-one...e--1989392
Amount or Item(s) Scammed: $70
Screenshots of Communication:  https://imgur.com/a/gu63xSS
Additional Information:
 
I am filing a dispute regarding a purchase I made for what was advertised as an “all-in-one AI tool bundle.” The seller specifically claimed that this bundle included access to Cursor Premium AI, which was the primary reason I agreed to buy it.

After paying, I discovered that Cursor Premium AI was not actually included. Instead, I was required to complete my own whitelist application, invest my own time and effort, and wait for approval. Although I was eventually accepted, the access still did not work. At this point it became clear that the seller had misrepresented what I was purchasing.

The only reason I bought this bundle was because the seller assured me that Cursor Premium AI would be included. Without that, the tools provided are easily obtainable directly from their original developers, and I would not have made this purchase.

Because the seller’s claims were false and the product was misrepresented, I am requesting a refund on the grounds of being misled and effectively scammed.
After requesting a refund, the seller stated that he “can’t refund” and that he is “not responsible because he is not the developer.” However, this does not change the fact that he misrepresented the product and sold access to something that was not actually included, which is a clear case of misleading conduct.
 
He advertised the bundle as including Cursor Premium AI, and this was the deciding factor for my purchase. Once I paid, I learned that Cursor Premium AI was not provided at all—I had to apply for my own whitelist, spend my own time and effort, and even after being accepted, the access still did not work.
 
Whether he is the developer or not is irrelevant. He sold a product based on claims that were false. Selling something that was never included in the first place is deceptive and fits the definition of a scam. If a seller markets a feature as part of the product, they are responsible for delivering it—regardless of where it comes from.
 
Because the product was misrepresented and the key feature I paid for was not delivered, I am again requesting a refund. This is a clear case of false advertising and failure to deliver the promised service.

After I informed the seller that I intended to file a report due to the false advertising of the product, the seller responded by claiming that I had “deleted messages.” This claim is untrue and appears to be an attempt to avoid responsibility for the misrepresentation of the product.
 

Crypto address for a refund: It will be posted later.

[0]

System bot message: @wintoria (wintoria), @pollymydolly (pollymydolly) have been notified about this dispute via private messages and have 24hours to reply in this thread

 

Taking care of cracked.sh's leechers. Every day.
If you have a question regarding your leeching level, click here.

[1.167]

My customer's question. I'm here to help with that. As seen in the first messages. My old customer bought a product from me before. And I delivered it without any problems.

Coming to this product. After the customer made the payment, the subscription started on the platform.

I told him the content of the artificial intelligence and gave him detailed information about the products included in it.

I'm not happy about the problem they're experiencing either. There are currently 300 customers experiencing this same issue. Now I'll explain the situation.


The customer paid for the order, and I delivered the product. The product brings together countless artificial intelligences.

After the customer made the purchase, I sent them all the details, and then it was time for the cursor. I sent them the necessary instructions.

To use Cursor, they needed to apply for the API. I helped them, and they applied. After that, they set it up and said it wasn't working.

By the way, these things don't happen in a day; I'd say it's a week-long process.


The platform owners opened Cursor on November 9th, and I sent them a special visual proof that it was working on that date. The customer purchased the product on November 11th. During this time, they even provided a positive reference. You can check their reputation history.


After they purchased the product on November 11th, I had them apply for the API, and the only thing left was for them to install and use the cursor. On November 12th at 12 PM, I told them I was ready for the setup in the early hours of the day. They said tomorrow.

Then the actual day arrived.

On November 13th, they disabled the cursor for use. More accurately, they took it offline for maintenance.
When I asked the platform owners about this, they said someone had misused it, rendering it unusable for other customers, so they took it offline for maintenance.

Alex, I'll send you a DM with the date they activated it, the date they did the setup guide for the cursor, etc. You can check it out.

It will probably be fixed in 2-3 days. But I can't give you an exact time right now. I don't develop the application. I'm just a salesperson doing marketing, that's all.

Also, there are no issues with any of the other services. If there are problems with the main services, the platform owners add compensation days to customers' memberships. They said they won't do that since Cursor was added as a beta.


I'm also waiting for it to open because there are many customers waiting for Cursor like me. I introduced it to a few more people on the forum. It's a good thing they didn't buy it yet because I could have had problems with them too. Also, I state that I will not make a refund in the TOS section, you can check it.

I will send you the images containing the date they launched Cursor and the date they closed it via DM. That's the proof. I sent this to the customer too, but they chose to file a complaint.

Still, it's not a problem.


Also, I said the cursor was only added to the product; I didn't guarantee it. I was genuinely curious how they would get the $200 ultra version for $70. They need to pay at least $1000 for all products. That's a bit funny.

They wrote that I misrepresented the product, but when we first talked, the product was open. There's even video evidence of this. I also sent a visual proof that it worked. They made the purchase after seeing that.

There was no conversation like, "I'm buying it for this reason," as they said. I introduced the product, they liked it, and they bought it. If it had been in writing, they might have been right, but I wrote to them that it worked within the specified period and why it's broken now.

The claim that the rest of the messages are on my computer is false.

So, it breaking in two days is a bit unlucky, yes, but there are still many days left in the subscription period. I'm sure they'll bring it.

The update states that the administrators have fixed all the bugs.

I'm waiting for it to open.

Also, many other features are still available for use.

I refuse to return it.

I also state this in the TOS.

I respectfully submit this to the administrators.

[58]

I would like to clarify several inaccuracies in the seller’s response, including his claim that he “helped me with the application,” which is false.

1. The seller stated he helped me with the API application — he did not
At no point did the seller assist me with the whitelist/API application.
I completed the application entirely on my own.

This directly contradicts his statement and shows that portions of his response are not accurate.

2. The core issue remains: Cursor Premium AI was advertised but never delivered
Regardless of the seller’s explanations, excuses, or technical claims, the following facts are clear:

• Cursor Premium AI was presented as part of the product.
  
• I purchased the bundle because Cursor was included.
  
• I never received working access.
  
• The feature was down almost immediately after purchase.
  
• The seller has no timeline for when it will return.
  

Sending instructions does not count as delivering the product.

3. Saying “I’m not the developer” does not remove responsibility
The seller marketed Cursor as part of the product and accepted payment for it.
Therefore, he is responsible for delivering it — regardless of who developed it.
A seller cannot advertise a feature, take money for it, then blame the developers when it never works.

4. The seller admits Cursor was taken offline shortly after I paid
He claims:

• It was open before,
  
• It was taken offline due to misuse,
  
• It is undergoing maintenance,
  
• He cannot give a timeframe,
  
• Hundreds of customers are also without access.
  

This confirms that the feature was not available during my subscription period, including the moment I purchased it.
If a key feature is not usable, the product is not delivered.

5. “No refund” policies do not apply to misrepresented or undelivered productsA TOS cannot override basic consumer protection.
You cannot refuse a refund when the advertised product was not delivered.

6. Additional misleading statements

• He claims I gave a positive reference. Early positive comments do not mean the promised product was delivered.
  
• He claims conversations support his claims — yet he falsely stated he helped me with the application, which he did not.
  
• He claims I deleted messages, which is untrue and irrelevant.
  

7. Summary
I purchased the bundle specifically because Cursor Premium AI was advertised as included.
The seller:

• did not help with the application,
  
• did not provide working access,
  
• admitted the feature went offline,
  
• has no timeframe for restoration,
  
• and now refuses a refund.
  

This is a clear case of misrepresentation and nondelivery.
I am requesting a refund based on these facts.

[1.167]

First, he said I didn't help him with the API application. That's not true.

1. Which site he needed to go to for the API. I helped him with where to get the API and how to apply for it; I have the records. I sent them to Alex.

This proves he's lying.

4. Response to the headline

I am not responsible for this. I am not developing the product. Also, regarding which days he worked. I made the necessary explanation and sent it. If it hadn't worked, the evidence I sent would have been insufficient. Also, you took the video and image AI because they caught your attention. This is present in the first messages. I introduced it to you at the beginning, and you asked me about the limits, and I told you.

Response to point 1

If the images from when I introduced the product hadn't worked, I wouldn't have sent them. The relevant teams are currently working on this.

Also, once you join any platform, you are automatically deemed to have accepted the terms. They determine this, not me.

If the product were completely faulty, you would be justified in your complaint. Also, by the nature of digital products, returns are not possible everywhere in the world. You can check all the current laws.

Response to point 6

I'm not claiming you did this. I'm requesting the managers to check this in the logs. It has been removed now, and I even received a notification. So, there is nothing misleading.

In addition to this, they asked me to pay extra to become a beta tester, the price is $50, which is ridiculous.

Also, he realized he could get it cheaper from the platform owners, so now he wants a full refund and will buy it from them later.

A fool who thinks he's smart.

Also,

Right now, the whole thing is about developing a project with the API.

The owners said they could develop the project using the Claude API via Cline and Roo Code as an alternative.

He can contact them and develop his projects through cline and roo code.


He will claim that it doesn't work because I wrote that to him. He couldn't do the setup because he's stupid.

He can contact them for the setup.

I explained all the developments one by one. I won't give this customer a refund, he's a moron who thinks he's smart, that's all.

I apologize to the managers for my profanity. But he started it.

Also, beta testers are currently testing the fix.

Because he found out about this, he demanded a $50 podcast subscription.

I can't do that; I'm not making any money, and it would mean serious damage.

He needs to pay another $50 to use the beta product as a tester.

[58]

I will respond to the seller’s newest claims clearly and factually, as his message now contains contradictions, incorrect statements, and personal insults that do not belong in a professional dispute.

1. The seller claims he “helped me with the API application.”
This is still false.

He did not walk me through the application.
He did not help me fill anything out.
He did not provide direct assistance beyond sending a link.
Sending a link is not “helping me with the application.”
I completed the entire application process myself.
His statement changes every time he replies, which shows inconsistency.

The seller claims he “helped me with the API application,” but that’s misleading.

• He only gave a link to the site and some basic instructions.
  
• I had to fill out the entire application myself and watch a video to understand how it worked.
  
• Saying he “helped” makes it sound like he actually did the setup for me — which is not true.
  

Basically, I had to do all the work on my own, and his assistance was minimal at best.

---

2. The seller again tries to say he is “not responsible” because he isn’t the developerThis has no relevance.
He advertised the product.
He sold the product.
He took payment for the product.
The person who takes the payment is responsible for what they sell — regardless of who develops it.
 

---

3. The seller admits the Cursor feature was brokenIn his own words:

• It was taken offline
  
• It is undergoing maintenance
  
• He does not know when it will return
  
• Customers must pay extra to become beta testers
  
• An alternative workaround using Cline/Roo Code was suggested
  
• He is also “waiting for it to open”
  

This all confirms that the feature I paid for was not delivered.
Even if he has screenshots of it working days before, that does not change the fact that when I purchased, it was not functional and never became functional.
 

---

4. He claims I only want a refund because I “found out I could get it cheaper”
False. I want a refund because:

• The product did not work,
  
• The key feature was not delivered,
  
• He refuses to provide a working replacement or timeline.
  

This is a deflection attempt.
 

---

5. Personal insults and accusations
He calls me:

• “a fool,”
  
• “a moron,”
  
• “stupid,”
  

These insults do not belong in a professional discussion and show he has lost objectivity.
This behavior alone demonstrates unprofessional conduct.
A seller who has delivered a product does not need to resort to profanity and personal attacks.

---

6. He contradicts himself repeatedly
Here are a few examples:

• He says he “did not guarantee” Cursor would work —
  yet advertised it as part of the bundle and sent instructions to apply for it.
  
• He says I “couldn’t do the setup” —
  yet earlier claimed he “helped me with the application.”
  
• He says I deleted messages —
  then says he’s “not claiming that.”
  

These contradictions undermine the credibility of his entire statement.
 

---

7. The alternative he suggests (using Cline/Roo Code) proves the original product is nonfunctional
His suggested workaround — using other tools instead of Cursor — proves that the main feature is not available, exactly as I’ve said since the beginning.
If a seller must recommend alternatives, then the original advertised feature is not delivered.

---

8. Summary of my complaint remains the same and unchanged:

• Cursor Premium AI was advertised as part of the product.
  
• It was not delivered in working condition at any point.
  
• The seller cannot provide a timeline or solution.
  
• He claims he is “not responsible.”
  
• He refuses a refund despite nondelivery.
  
• He is now insulting me, contradicting himself, and changing the story repeatedly.
  

This is a clear case of misrepresentation, nondelivery, and unprofessional conduct.
I respectfully request that moderators review the evidence and issue a refund based on the facts.

[3.011]

@pollymydolly

 

Issue a full refund to the buyer.

 

The advertised product was not delivered, and no functional replacement or restoration was provided at any point during the buyer’s subscription period. This constitutes clear misrepresentation and nondelivery of a core component of the purchased bundle.

 

You have 24 hours to refund the buyer.

 

@City —  Provide a wallet address here in the thread to receive the refund.

@pollymydolly — Do NOT send the refund to any address other than the one posted publicly by the OP ( @City ) within this thread.

 

   [Selling Signature Ad Space - DM Me]

 

[Ping's PGP Key]

Before conducting any form of business confirm my identity through onsite PM.

[58]

BTC 35xMJyZRo2ZsztV7p54oUjioDVDkxWCfga
ETH 0xF6f478C73F7b1D6716A026bBc2Ba45a92Eb8B867
SOL A2YBBzGbSSNqC1unxfvhPwyMMX16RSjq8frjZ4gGLANG