12 March, 2020 - 03:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 12 March, 2020 - 03:47 PM by MonsterPrograms.)
(12 March, 2020 - 04:32 AM)HarleyQuinn Wrote: Show More(12 March, 2020 - 01:18 AM)MonsterPrograms Wrote: Show More(12 March, 2020 - 01:02 AM)HarleyQuinn Wrote: Show Morefuck off already
i showed you its flagging an out of instance check before you even bought it and you're allied with him ofc you're gonna take his side
https://gyazo.com/30503cefba95ba608913770a9dba3231
You said here it's not related to the autoclicker, but it clearly is looking at the evidence my friend has provided. Seems like you're a little bit mad as well
Detected autoclicker when my friend scanned it as you can see: https://gyazo.com/9537cbc2c28de225e4037d979351dbda
First of all, as you can read it is an "experimental" check after all, and there can be multiple false positives. The clicker is also being detected as "Out of instance", means you can't really prove that it was being used in that specific instance of Minecraft. Is this not good enough of a bypass? Paladin has multiple detection methods, including strings and some applications, generate strings which are very similar to that of auto clickers, so there are a lot of chances of false positives. You can't really rely on such detections, and no server would ban for it, so I would still say it is bypassing. Other than that, windows itself stores a lot of information which is impossible to delete but can be read, so it is not difficult to get such information.
Other than that, contacting an owner of Paladin is the worst decision you could have made because he can now easily decompile the application and you've made it ten times easier for him to detect such clickers...
![[Image: 30503cefba95ba608913770a9dba3231.png]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fgyazo.com%2F30503cefba95ba608913770a9dba3231.png)
Tbh everything you've said there is true so I'm not going to argue about it.
I think by this point we've both seen that the PayPal dispute has been closed in favour of you just because I received the item eventhough I put the dispute reason as 'received the item but it wasn't as described'. I would've liked PayPal to give me the benefit of the doubt there due to buyer protection and put some more thought into it so there could've been a fairer outcome. Doesn't matter at this point, the case has already been closed. I'm sorry for what happened, I'm a greedy person in general and always have my eyes focused on the best possible outcome, and sometimes I get ahead of myself without thinking properly. I think that's what's been happening throughout this entire deal and in some things I do in life. I need to take a step back sometimes. I know I could do a lot better because I'm a way better person than this.
I think it's best that this scam report comes to a close, as you have now received the money back and I think there was just a lot of misunderstanding on both ends e.g. regarding you thinking my friend knew vb.net, and me not really understanding the Paladin detections. There's nothing else to argue about now.
