SCAM REPORT AGAINST NotaNumber

[6.050]

@NotaNumber so if the bypass works for you on Walmart why doesn't it work for @tigra8311?

[50]

he says that the problem is not in perimetrX but in TLS FP.But why do we need access to a non-working config if we don't have access to the source code and can't fix it.Also, access to the api and discord was never provided to us.

[85]

@NotaNumber so if the bypass works for you on Walmart why doesn't it work for @tigra8311?

He doesn't know how to use it, its an API and I implemented the API into the free configs you got with purchase to help with methods of bypassing PX and the TLS FP for Openbullet got banned from Walmart.
So you can make a working checker or openbullet config if you can change your TLS FP to something else other than Openbullet's default fingerprint.
And like I mentioned, tigra doesn't know what he was purchasing and is blaming me for being uneducated on this sort of matter

Yes I can show a PoC of this if needed

[13]

I apologize for interfering in someone else's dispute, but we have one topic. The problem is that initially your service provided perimeterX api for a specific list of sites. The site of interest to us was Walmart and you confirmed that your api works with this site. And an hour later it broke down, you refused our request to return the money, you promised that you would restore the Walmart config to work, but you could not do it. After we began to demand that you fulfill your promise, we were banned. As a result, for an hour of working with your api, we paid $ 100, and you are not ready to return even half of this amount to us. For some reason you are trying to expose the situation in such a way that you don’t owe us anything, but you didn’t give us access to the api, Walmart, even though due to technical features he cannot now work with your api. You are acting outrageous. If you provide the administration with a working version of the api with the Walmart config, it will mean that you provided us with a non-working version earlier. In my topic, I gave evidence that you yourself admitted that Walmart does not work with your api. It is sometimes difficult for us to express our thoughts in a "difficult" language, since English is not our native language, but in general I think our position is more than understandable. And you are always trying to dodge, you have not provided any proof here. Why are you doing this? Is our money so vital to you that you are ready to continue this shame further?

[85]

I apologize for interfering in someone else's dispute, but we have one topic. The problem is that initially your service provided perimeterX api for a specific list of sites. The site of interest to us was Walmart and you confirmed that your api works with this site. And an hour later it broke down, you refused our request to return the money, you promised that you would restore the Walmart config to work, but you could not do it. After we began to demand that you fulfill your promise, we were banned. As a result, for an hour of working with your api, we paid $ 100, and you are not ready to return even half of this amount to us. For some reason you are trying to expose the situation in such a way that you don’t owe us anything, but you didn’t give us access to the api, Walmart, even though due to technical features he cannot now work with your api. You are acting outrageous. If you provide the administration with a working version of the api with the Walmart config, it will mean that you provided us with a non-working version earlier. In my topic, I gave evidence that you yourself admitted that Walmart does not work with your api. It is sometimes difficult for us to express our thoughts in a "difficult" language, since English is not our native language, but in general I think our position is more than understandable. And you are always trying to dodge, you have not provided any proof here. Why are you doing this? Is our money so vital to you that you are ready to continue this shame further?

Stop acting like the victim, the PX bypass was still working after the config stopped working because of the TLS FP ban, you were not banned by me you were banned by Brayden for being toxic in our server (which can be proven by asking Brayden's server). You were removed access from the API since you were banned off the server (I do not have access to your license keys). You even went as far as to say IP binding was useless and wanted a refund because we were improving security. You do not understand what you were purchasing and clearly do not have the knowledge to use the API and I will not be refunding a working product.

[50]

I don't understand why this person hasn't been banned yet.The topic was created by him and not by Bryden,the money was also paid to him,there is no guide in the topic and there is not a word about selling the api to other people and transferring responsibility.

[50]

This is a bump

[6.050]

User banned. Sorry for your loss.

Registration IP: 43.245.162.131
Last Known IP: 198.54.132.54