Sales Thread:
None. This report is not related to any product or service transaction, but to repeated false allegations and targeted harassment by the user.
Amount or Item(s) Scammed:
None. No money or assets were exchanged between me and this user. His accusations are based entirely on speculation, not on a scam or dispute.
The full conversation shows the handover of Telegram credentials, confirmation of LTC payment, and explicit permission to take ownership. This occurred before any public username change. There is no evidence tying me to prior activity under that account prior to the transaction.
Additional Information:
The user @vely has launched a baseless smear campaign against me, accusing me of being a previously banned user (zRad) based solely on similarities in username structure and outdated Telegram information. These accusations are unsubstantiated and misrepresent the facts.
I acquired the Telegram handle in question through a legitimate purchase on June 16, 2025. The seller, who went by the alias zRad, provided the account credentials along with a supplier list. After gaining access, I changed the account information and rebranded it under my name. This was a clean transition of ownership, and there is nothing in the seller’s history or my own that justifies a ban or caution label.
There are no scam victims, no transactions linked to vely’s claim, and no direct evidence of wrongdoing. My operations are fully transparent, and I am active in a live community of buyers on Discord. To date, not a single customer has submitted a complaint or report of fraud against me.
My community is open to moderation if needed for additional verification: https://discord.gg/qMtFjdvJJA
It is clear that vely’s actions are personal in nature and designed to damage my standing. He has resorted to making unsupported claims, asking for moderator action without basis, and encouraging others to draw false associations.
This is a misuse of the reporting system and wastes moderation resources. I am requesting staff review this pattern of behavior and consider appropriate action against vely for submitting misleading reports, attempting to weaponize past bans against unrelated individuals, and disrupting business with unsupported theories.
Crypto address for a refund:
None. No transaction or scam occurred.
This post is by a banned member (Leechometer) - Unhide
18 June, 2025 - 02:12 AM(This post was last modified: 18 June, 2025 - 02:25 AM by vely. Edited 1 time in total.)
Reply
If it’s true that you really did receive the Telegram account from the scammer zRad, then I will apologize for that part.
However, this report is based on clearly visible facts and cannot be considered an “abuse” of the reporting system.
If you truly took over everything from zRad and rebranded on June 16, then what were the other upgrade services that were being sold before that date?
Are you saying you were already an upgrade seller and simply received Adobe services from zRad and rebranded them?Did you originally not have a Telegram account and only communicate with suppliers via Discord, then receive the account from zRad and start using Telegram from that point onward?
Also, if the only goal was to get the supplier list, then why did you buy the Telegram account instead of just creating your own? That list could’ve easily been handed over to a new account.
I’d appreciate it if you could provide proof of the LTC transaction that took place at the time.
If you also have prior conversations with the seller, sharing those would be great — they might even serve as proof that it wasn’t hastily put together.
Again, this is a reasonable report based on observable facts. If you explain the situation clearly, I think this could actually be a good opportunity for you to clear things up.
At the end of the day, you’ve taken over the account of someone who was banned for scamming—and that kind of reputation inevitably follows.
My English isn’t perfect, so some of what I’m trying to say might not come across clearly. I hope you’ll understand.
I spoke based only on what was visible, and if you provide evidence, the moderators will make the judgment afterward. @Barry @Darkness @Liars
To prove that the Discord conversations haven't been tampered with, It would be great if you could show it in a video using the refresh feature. +This could also be a minor misunderstanding, but if there are many messages in a Discord conversation, the scrollbar should appear smaller. However, it doesn’t look like you had a long conversation with that person. I’m not being malicious—I'm just commenting based on the Discord system shown in the photo you posted...
OP18 June, 2025 - 03:25 AM(This post was last modified: 18 June, 2025 - 03:34 AM by Nexoro.)
Reply
Yes, I acquired the Telegram account in question from zRad on June 16.
hat much is already clear from the Discord screenshot I shared. But there’s context behind why the Discord conversation is short, and it directly addresses your scrollbar theory.
I know zRad personally, as in real life, not just online. We had done business in the past, and I was already familiar with how he operated. When I heard he was stepping away from the scene, I pitched the idea directly to him, in person, to take over the Telegram, since it was already linked to suppliers, clients, and infrastructure. That’s why I didn’t create a new Telegram from scratch. I wasn’t just buying a list, I was taking over a working asset.
The Discord conversation was never meant to show the full deal process. It was just the channel used to finalize the handoff. We used phone calls to coordinate, not DMs. I bumped him on Discord just to confirm the account and get the credentials. That’s why the message history is short. Nothing more, nothing less. The absence of a scrollbar doesn’t prove fabrication, it proves efficiency.
As for the “services” running before the handover: I was already doing upgrades, but I didn’t advertise them publicly through Telegram until I had full control over the zRad channel. I ran things via Discord for my own clients. The acquisition wasn’t about learning the game, it was about expanding. I integrated my own services with what I acquired and moved forward from there.
Regarding the LTC payment: the guy’s gone now, banned, disconnected. I’ll look through my records and see if I can pull the hash, but I’m not going to invent something just because it fits your expected checklist. The transaction happened. That’s why I have the account.
You're treating this like it’s some cover-up because you're trying to trace patterns through usernames and UI details. But there’s no scam, no harmed party, no deception. You’re forming a narrative from observation, not facts.
This isn’t about avoiding accountability, it’s about not letting misinterpretation frame a story that never existed. Moderators will judge as they see fit. My record is clean. My services are running. No client has ever raised a claim. That speaks louder than hypothetical suspicion.
+The guy you’re talking about "zRad" is already gone. He paid the price and got banned. If you actually followed his activity, you’d know he had a solid reputation before that. He delivered, had clean threads, and never scammed anyone. Even the reports against him were questionable, and he didn’t get the chance to appeal, Cracked was seized not long after and everything stalled.You’re a reputable member, so I know you understand how to read context. But right now, it feels like you’re just trying to flag anything that looks suspicious, even when there’s no damage, no victim, and no wrongdoing.
At the end of the day, no one on this forum has been scammed. No complaints have been made. No customers have reported anything. This isn’t affecting anyone, and turning it into a public case doesn’t change that honestly
18 June, 2025 - 06:09 AM(This post was last modified: 18 June, 2025 - 06:11 AM by vely. Edited 2 times in total.)
Reply
I'm not trying to make a problem out of nothing. The reality is, in the Cracked community, scams involving alts are common — we've seen them happen repeatedly. That's why I felt the need to raise this issue.
If this helps clear things up, then you’ll be able to clear your false accusation, But if it turns out you're actually zRad, then this could help prevent future scams.
And I don’t know whether zRad had a good reputation or not. The fact is, he got banned. Cracked came back online, so he definitely had the chance to clear his name. But he didn’t, and that’s the bottom line.
And if zRad created a new account, of course that account would be clean—it’s basically a fresh start. (This is just a hypothetical, I’m not saying you’re a scammer.)
Anyway, let’s move past this.
If the Discord conversation was really just for finalizing the handoff, then it would help if you could show proof that you were actually on a call (timeline) with him around that time.
Also bro, you made the deal with him two days prior. Then it shouldn't be hard to find LTC transaction, right?
And why exactly did he suddenly get 'banned' and disappear? What happened to the connection?
Plus, if you look at the screenshot, it looks like you've had conversations with him via chat before. You're not going to say that was through a different Discord account, right?
If you used a different messenger, just show a proof of that.
Also, you mentioned the channel had suppliers and client infrastructure connected.
Then show a glimpse of that (I mean the channel with you, the clients, and the infrastructure.) — it's fine to blur sensitive parts
So here’s what So here’s what I (and maybe moderator too) want
LTC transaction that matches the time you said you sent the payment to him. (Not with F12 or Photoshop, but with a video — and it needs to show a refresh as well.)
Full Discord conversation with him — even if it’s short, that’s fine. (Not with F12 or Photoshop, but with a video — and it needs to show a refresh as well.)
If most of it happened over a call and Discord was only brief, then show some kind of call record — like a timeline or something. (Not with F12 or Photoshop, but with a video — and it needs to show a refresh as well.)
I don’t think there’s any need for further discussion. Let’s just present the proof and wait for the mod to make their judgment.
Again, this is a legitimate claim.
I understand where you’re coming from, scams through alts do happen, and caution is valid. But there’s a difference between raising a flag and pushing demands like you’re leading an investigation. You’re not.
I’ve already explained the situation in full:
– I acquired the account from someone stepping away from the scene.
– The Discord conversation was the tail end of an agreement that happened largely off-platform, and yes, I knew him personally.
– Payment was made earlier, and delivery happened when the handoff was finalized. That gap doesn’t imply anything suspicious, it happens all the time.
You’ve now shifted from raising concerns to demanding videos, call logs, infrastructure previews, and refreshed proofs, as if I’m required to satisfy your own private checklist. That’s not how this works. Moderators don’t require staged walkthroughs just because someone speculates.
You also asked why zRad was banned. I’m not here to defend him, he’s gone. Whether the ban was justified or not, it’s irrelevant. What matters is that no scam, deception, or damage exists on my end, and nothing you’re pointing to changes that.
The reality is simple:
– No one has been scammed.
– No funds have been lost.
– No customer has complained.
– The account transfer was clean, and the rebrand happened openly.
You’ve presented theory, I’ve presented the full context. If staff needs anything further, I’ll respond directly to them.
But from my side, I’m not continuing a cycle of “prove this next.” That’s not how due process works here, and it’s not how good-faith concerns get resolved.
Let the moderators assess the facts. I’ve said what needed to be said.
This is not a valid deal dispute. No scam occurred, no transaction took place, and no party suffered financial loss or breach of agreement.
The claim pertains to identity misattribution and personal grievance, not a commercial dispute. As such, it was filed in the wrong section.
For future concerns of this nature, use the community alert system or report directly to staff via support channels.
![[Image: Qf9Wfwe.png]](https://i.imgur.com/Qf9Wfwe.png)
+This could also be a minor misunderstanding, but if there are many messages in a Discord conversation, the scrollbar should appear smaller. However, it doesn’t look like you had a long conversation with that person. I’m not being malicious—I'm just commenting based on the Discord system shown in the photo you posted...
![[Image: IsgBGGU.png]](https://i.imgur.com/IsgBGGU.png)
