VEGA CODING AKA RUSTICUS ON TELEGRAM 290$ (REOPENED)

[1.243]

I fully understand the request for a video demonstration to verify the software works. I am willing to cooperate, but I must clarify a critical technical constraint preventing a successful "full execution" video, and propose a standard debugging step to resolve this dispute fairly.
1. The Technical Impossibility of Full ExecutionMy specific role in this project was to build a "pipeline" (modifying the output handler) to send data from the software to a new server. I did not write the core software that generates this data; that was provided by the client.
Currently, the core software provided by the client is not generating any data.

• Analogy: I was hired to attach a new exhaust pipe to a car. However, the car's engine does not start. Because the engine (the client's software) isn't running, nothing comes out of the exhaust pipe (my modification).
  
• Conclusion: I cannot record a video of the software "working" because the base software I was given does not perform its primary function of generating logs/data.
  

2. Proof of My Work (The Pipeline)I have already verified that my specific code for the server communication logic is syntactically correct and functions as intended when data is present. I have successfully unit-tested the connection to the server. The failure occurs upstream, in the client's original code, which is failing to feed data into my pipeline.
3. The "Control Test" Proposal (Crucial for Fairness)To determine objectively whether the fault lies with my modification or the client's original file, we must establish a baseline. We cannot assume the original software works, as the client admitted they never verified it.
I respectfully request the Moderator ask the Client to perform the following:

Please provide a video demonstrating the ORIGINAL, unmodified source code (the exact version sent to me) running successfully and generating data.

The Logic for Dispute Resolution:

1. If the Client CAN show the original works: Then the error is likely in my modification. I will immediately accept responsibility and fix the code to match the working original.
   
2. If the Client CANNOT show the original works: Then they provided me with broken software from the start. I cannot be held responsible for fixing a broken product that was outside my scope of work.
   

ConclusionI am ready to proceed, but asking me to prove a broken program works is an impossible standard. The burden of proof must first be on the client to show they provided a functional base. Once they verify the "engine" runs, I can prove my "exhaust pipe" works perfectly.

Dude, you didnt even tested your own code modified, you sent me the file to test it bymyself on a vm because you didnt had a virtual machine, you didnt even either executed it on ur own pc because you sayed is to "risky"(keeping in mind that you had the full source code lol)

The Logic for Dispute Resolution:

1. If the Client CAN show the original works: Then the error is likely in my modification. I will immediately accept responsibility and fix the code to match the working original.
   
2. If the Client CANNOT show the original works: Then they provided me with broken software from the start. I cannot be held responsible for fixing a broken product that was outside my scope of work.
   

ConclusionI am ready to proceed, but asking me to prove a broken program works is an impossible standard. The burden of proof must first be on the client to show they provided a functional base. Once they verify the "engine" runs, I can prove my "exhaust pipe" works perfectly.

[3.770]

@Bad_King send me a video of the full unmodified program running without problem.

Top Ad by @Views | Ends in 22/03

[299]

@Bad_King send me a video of the full unmodified program running without problem.

Then give me a telegram account, because my account was banned 10-11 months ago. 
Also, why do I have to send you the video? You asked him first, I already posted photos of the software working at the first post, he didnt. You change your opinion from day to other? My time is not free

---

@Alex Also, dont avoid the fact that the user task was also to change the function names and variables of the code, wich he didnt. The fact that the software works or doesnt works doesnt matter at this point. If you cannot complete the full task at this point, then I want a refund. I dont accept half jobs, wtf is this.

[1.243]

I would like to highlight what just happened here. The Moderator gave a clear, logical instruction: "send me a video of the full unmodified program running without problem."
Instead of providing this simple proof to resolve the dispute, the Client has responded with:

1. Excuses regarding platform bans: (Telegram status is irrelevant; videos can be uploaded to Streamable, Mega, or Google Drive).
   
2. Defensiveness: Arguing with the Moderator about why he has to prove his own software works.
   
3. False Claims: Stating he "already posted photos."
   

1. The "Photos" Claim is False I ask the Moderator to check the thread history. There are no screenshots verifying the original software is functional in a live environment. If there were, this dispute wouldn't exist. Furthermore, static screenshots can be faked; a video of the process running is the standard proof of functionality, which he is refusing to provide.
2. The "Time is Not Free" Defense The Client claims his "time is not free," yet he has spent days arguing in this dispute. It takes less than 5 minutes to record a screen capture of the software working—if it actually works. The refusal to spend 5 minutes to win the dispute suggests the evidence simply does not exist.
3. Project Scope & Delivery I delivered the work. I provided unit test results for the specific pipeline logic I built. The Client accepted the files. He only raised issues after realizing his own base software (the "engine") was not starting. I cannot be held responsible for fixing his broken software which was never part of our agreement.
4. Reputation & Conclusion I have built a solid reputation here over many years with numerous positive vouches. I take my work seriously. This baseless report is damaging my business and wasting the Moderator's time.
The Reality: The Client is deflecting because he cannot pass the "Control Test." He bought a modification for broken software, and now he wants a refund (or free repair work) because his software doesn't work.
I respectfully request that if the Client cannot produce a video of the ORIGINAL software working within 24 hours, this dispute be closed in my favor.

[299]

I would like to highlight what just happened here. The Moderator gave a clear, logical instruction: "send me a video of the full unmodified program running without problem."
Instead of providing this simple proof to resolve the dispute, the Client has responded with:

1. Excuses regarding platform bans: (Telegram status is irrelevant; videos can be uploaded to Streamable, Mega, or Google Drive).
   
2. Defensiveness: Arguing with the Moderator about why he has to prove his own software works.
   
3. False Claims: Stating he "already posted photos."
   

1. The "Photos" Claim is False I ask the Moderator to check the thread history. There are no screenshots verifying the original software is functional in a live environment. If there were, this dispute wouldn't exist. Furthermore, static screenshots can be faked; a video of the process running is the standard proof of functionality, which he is refusing to provide.
2. The "Time is Not Free" Defense The Client claims his "time is not free," yet he has spent days arguing in this dispute. It takes less than 5 minutes to record a screen capture of the software working—if it actually works. The refusal to spend 5 minutes to win the dispute suggests the evidence simply does not exist.
3. Project Scope & Delivery I delivered the work. I provided unit test results for the specific pipeline logic I built. The Client accepted the files. He only raised issues after realizing his own base software (the "engine") was not starting. I cannot be held responsible for fixing his broken software which was never part of our agreement.
4. Reputation & Conclusion I have built a solid reputation here over many years with numerous positive vouches. I take my work seriously. This baseless report is damaging my business and wasting the Moderator's time.
The Reality: The Client is deflecting because he cannot pass the "Control Test." He bought a modification for broken software, and now he wants a refund (or free repair work) because his software doesn't work.
I respectfully request that if the Client cannot produce a video of the ORIGINAL software working within 24 hours, this dispute be closed in my favor.

Is not only the fact your code doesnt works, its also because you didnt changed the code as I told you(functions and variables names). You are a scammer

[1.243]

@Alex As you can see, he doesn't even have any proof that the original code worked. All he wanted to do was get the broken code fixed for free, i'm not responsible for it. Please close the dispute, it's been going on for months now.

[299]

I just added you in to the ignore list, its uselles to comment me

[3.770]

Due to the lack of evidence from OP's side, this case is marked as inconclusive and closed.

Top Ad by @Views | Ends in 22/03