⎝ DorkReaper ⎠ Dork Generator ꣼ Get UHQ Dorks Easily ꣼ Beta

[136]

This is what I need

#1 Google Proxyless Parser:
D+ 
https://dorkplus.com/

-----------------------------------------------
Tools,Combos, Accounts and much ​​more...
Check my Store:
https://redbullz187.mysellix.io/de/

 

[913]

THIS CONTENT IS SPONSORED BY: ZENTOOLZ.SHOP & VPNHEAVEN.SHOP
LEAVE A LIKE FOR MORE HQ CONTENT <3
LEECHERS WILL BE REPORTED

Download:



Features:

- GUI is clean/easy to use
- Built-in error logging
- Automatic duplicate line remover

Preview:



VirusTotal:

[ CLICK ]

ok but that aint opensource

It is open-source, lmfao. Just throw it in dnSpy.

---

This is a bump

open source and not protected is 2 completely different things. lol

[4.486]

ok but that aint opensource

It is open-source, lmfao. Just throw it in dnSpy.

---

This is a bump

open source and not protected is 2 completely different things. lol

Nigga what difference does it make if I just copy and paste the source code and post it for everyone to see when it's already publicly available??????? Are you saying the source is not open?

It takes the equivalent of 2 brain cells to retrieve the source code.

[913]

It is open-source, lmfao. Just throw it in dnSpy.

---

This is a bump

open source and not protected is 2 completely different things. lol

Nigga what difference does it make if I just copy and paste the source code and post it for everyone to see when it's already publicly available??????? Are you saying the source is not open?

It takes the equivalent of 2 brain cells to retrieve the source code.

Again (since you dont seem to be able to comprehend what i said the first time). UNPROTECTED does NOT equal open source. When advertising "open source" you should post the source.

Here's a chatgpt response in very good and readable english.

"No, an unprotected program that is easy to disassemble is not the same as being open source. Open source means the source code is made freely available and can be modified and distributed under an open source license. An unprotected program simply means it lacks obfuscation or protection mechanisms, making it easier to reverse-engineer, but the source code is not necessarily provided or legally accessible."

[4.486]

open source and not protected is 2 completely different things. lol

Nigga what difference does it make if I just copy and paste the source code and post it for everyone to see when it's already publicly available??????? Are you saying the source is not open?

It takes the equivalent of 2 brain cells to retrieve the source code.

Again (since you dont seem to be able to comprehend what i said the first time). UNPROTECTED does NOT equal open source. When advertising "open source" you should post the source.

Here's a chatgpt response in very good and readable english.

"No, an unprotected program that is easy to disassemble is not the same as being open source. Open source means the source code is made freely available and can be modified and distributed under an open source license. An unprotected program simply means it lacks obfuscation or protection mechanisms, making it easier to reverse-engineer, but the source code is not necessarily provided or legally accessible."

lol stfu plz

[913]

Nigga what difference does it make if I just copy and paste the source code and post it for everyone to see when it's already publicly available??????? Are you saying the source is not open?

It takes the equivalent of 2 brain cells to retrieve the source code.

Again (since you dont seem to be able to comprehend what i said the first time). UNPROTECTED does NOT equal open source. When advertising "open source" you should post the source.

Here's a chatgpt response in very good and readable english.

"No, an unprotected program that is easy to disassemble is not the same as being open source. Open source means the source code is made freely available and can be modified and distributed under an open source license. An unprotected program simply means it lacks obfuscation or protection mechanisms, making it easier to reverse-engineer, but the source code is not necessarily provided or legally accessible."

lol stfu plz

great response, another won argument

[32]

Thank

[356]

[font]thank you[/font]