OP25 April, 2022 - 07:50 PM(This post was last modified: 26 April, 2022 - 02:40 AM by TOTSUKA.)
Reply
This is a bump
@Liars i am waiting what you will decide
@Liars another proof, yesterday I made the scam report where and the seller of the script only said that it was my fault because the AI marked me, well today I publish in its dircord that the script 1 that was the one I buy, MURIO, that shows that my loss is because your script does not work, I just ask please that I be made a refund of the total amount I pay https://ibb.co/Vw5htLZ
take responsibility and return what you pay please @Liars answer this thread
I bought the pack bronze 30$ includes 2 script of which in a week of buying the script 2 stopped working, https://ibb.co/7rN8tVk
said that I could only use script 1, and that script was the one that made me lose in only 30 min of use, and now that script died because of that I lost, what more tests do you want? buy 2 script and lost because of the scripts and now none works, so I lost the money you pay for the script without counting the $ 20 you lost in the bets https://ibb.co/Vw5htLZ
26 April, 2022 - 10:42 AM(This post was last modified: 26 April, 2022 - 10:42 AM by OPSKB.)
Reply
I SAID I AM WORKING ON UPDATED SCRIPTS , IF THESE SCRIPTS ARE DYING ITS MY DUTY TO INFORM EVERYONE LIKE YOU GUYS THINK YOU HAVE TO JUST PRESS START BUTTON AND BOOM RICH IN A DAY @Ping
@Ping he did that after I informed him that I lost, he did it a day later, so that I want another script that does not work if it made me lose almost everything bet, I want reimbursement not another script that will make me lose another time
The idea of an AI flagging the user and taking the action of simply making the user instantaneously lose their money is highly doubtful, for an array of reasons.
Why would the company desire the reputation of actually being known for stealing funds of their users via automated/rigged betting interactions? Especially when there are numerous other routes for them to protect and defend themselves against these types of occurrences, such as placing the funds on hold, freezing withdrawals, suspending the account, and so forth.
For the company to take such action as to seemingly rig their users' bets based on whether or not it was flagged by an automated software sounds to be absurd and poorly thought out. When considering the company is not at any point in time risking losing the funds you have invested or having their own bankroll affected up to the point in time in which you are requesting to have your funds withdrawn from their system.
The company can at any point place holds, freezes, and limitations on your funds. Hence making the idea of an ai rigging your bets to lose sound fairly preposterous when looked at from the company's perspective.
Because from their perspective, it has no beneficial gain. It would do nothing but harm their company's credibility, and lose them money as a whole due to forfeiting the trust of their userbase. An AI to detect botting, and other activities are within reason, definitely.
Whenever it comes to this bot's interactions, however, interference with a live bet shouldn't even be within the realm of reason, especially when in order for the customer to claim their prize, they must first go through a process of withdrawal established and maintained by your company.
In the unlikely event, there is actually sat in stone evidence of the company having this AI which behaves in the way which has been depicted throughout the course of the thread then provide proof through cited sources of the company's statements verifying these claims.
Not to mention though, I am fairly certain the majority of these gambling companies provide a means of proving their games are not rigged through the act provable fair games, the idea of an ai interaction affecting your game would entirely destroy their claim to 'provable fair'.
The idea of an AI flagging the user and taking the action of simply making the user instantaneously lose their money is highly doubtful, for an array of reasons.
Why would the company desire the reputation of actually being known for stealing funds of their users via automated/rigged betting interactions? Especially when there are numerous other routes for them to protect and defend themselves against these types of occurrences, such as placing the funds on hold, freezing withdrawals, suspending the account, and so forth.
For the company to take such action as to seemingly rig their users' bets based on whether or not it was flagged by an automated software sounds to be absurd and poorly thought out. When considering the company is not at any point in time risking losing the funds you have invested or having their own bankroll affected up to the point in time in which you are requesting to have your funds withdrawn from their system.
The company can at any point place holds, freezes, and limitations on your funds. Hence making the idea of an ai rigging your bets to lose sound fairly preposterous when looked at from the company's perspective.
Because from their perspective, it has no beneficial gain. It would do nothing but harm their company's credibility, and lose them money as a whole due to forfeiting the trust of their userbase. An AI to detect botting, and other activities are within reason, definitely.
Whenever it comes to this bot's interactions, however, interference with a live bet shouldn't even be within the realm of reason, especially when in order for the customer to claim their prize, they must first go through a process of withdrawal established and maintained by your company.
In the unlikely event, there is actually sat in stone evidence of the company having this AI which behaves in the way which has been depicted throughout the course of the thread then provide proof through cited sources of the company's statements verifying these claims.
Not to mention though, I am fairly certain the majority of these gambling companies provide a means of proving their games are not rigged through the act provable fair games, the idea of an ai interaction affecting your game would entirely destroy their claim to 'provable fair'.
The idea of an AI flagging the user and taking the action of simply making the user instantaneously lose their money is highly doubtful, for an array of reasons.
Why would the company desire the reputation of actually being known for stealing funds of their users via automated/rigged betting interactions? Especially when there are numerous other routes for them to protect and defend themselves against these types of occurrences, such as placing the funds on hold, freezing withdrawals, suspending the account, and so forth.
For the company to take such action as to seemingly rig their users' bets based on whether or not it was flagged by an automated software sounds to be absurd and poorly thought out. When considering the company is not at any point in time risking losing the funds you have invested or having their own bankroll affected up to the point in time in which you are requesting to have your funds withdrawn from their system.
The company can at any point place holds, freezes, and limitations on your funds. Hence making the idea of an ai rigging your bets to lose sound fairly preposterous when looked at from the company's perspective.
Because from their perspective, it has no beneficial gain. It would do nothing but harm their company's credibility, and lose them money as a whole due to forfeiting the trust of their userbase. An AI to detect botting, and other activities are within reason, definitely.
Whenever it comes to this bot's interactions, however, interference with a live bet shouldn't even be within the realm of reason, especially when in order for the customer to claim their prize, they must first go through a process of withdrawal established and maintained by your company.
In the unlikely event, there is actually sat in stone evidence of the company having this AI which behaves in the way which has been depicted throughout the course of the thread then provide proof through cited sources of the company's statements verifying these claims.
Not to mention though, I am fairly certain the majority of these gambling companies provide a means of proving their games are not rigged through the act provable fair games, the idea of an ai interaction affecting your game would entirely destroy their claim to 'provable fair'.
(26 April, 2022 - 10:10 PM)TOTSUKA Wrote: Show More
@Ping he did that after I informed him that I lost, he did it a day later, so that I want another script that does not work if it made me lose almost everything bet, I want reimbursement not another script that will make me lose another time
sorry , but i have already informed this to everyone in the Discord server
OP27 April, 2022 - 05:23 PM(This post was last modified: 27 April, 2022 - 10:20 PM by TOTSUKA.)
Reply
@Ping send you everything by private message
the retarded I block the discord after taking capture of his post he made saying that the script is dead, is a scammer and I want my money back
This post is by a banned member (TOTSUKA) - Unhide
![[Image: image.png]](https://i.ibb.co/ygJwsWY/image.png)
![[Image: spotify-Signature-gif.gif]](https://i.ibb.co/wWGDPKp/spotify-Signature-gif.gif)
![[Image: Signature-gif.gif]](https://i.ibb.co/8sYvmWc/Signature-gif.gif)
![[Image: Il1iGsh.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/Il1iGsh.gif)
