08 October, 2020 - 09:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 08 October, 2020 - 09:22 PM by Financier.)
(08 October, 2020 - 08:58 PM)Amcdon20 Wrote: Show MoreProof of grabify once he couldn’t scam me
https://imgur.com/gallery/GVvQ16f
(08 October, 2020 - 08:54 PM)HonchoHoncho Wrote: Show More(08 October, 2020 - 08:33 PM)Amcdon20 Wrote: Show MoreThis guy claimed he could crack a software for me for money and requested amounts beforehand so he could exit scammed and proved to know nothing about programming at all. Then continued to grabify me once I called him out. Username is Hyperion2020. If I need proof I have it.
Based on the way you're speaking and on the fact that you "have proof" but aren't providing it I have come to the unequivocal conclusion that you are full of shit. You do realize that a lot of people use programs to crack (i.e. don't need to know much at all about programming) and that not all crackers are crazy good programmers winning hack-a-thons and getting sucked off by Zuckerburg? You're confusing the Asian and cracker communities, me think
Anyways, how did that man "continue" to Grabify you exactly? And what was it that alerted you to the fact that you'd been touched?
Oh, and you can't be scammed or exit scammed if you never paid, agreed to pay or entered the metaphorical bedroom with the person that you're claiming to have scammed you. As for the Grabify angle, if you click a link that originated on Cracked.to or from a Cracked.to member then chances are you just got touched in ways you don't even want to imagine. No need for a scam report on it, please don't post a scam report on me for pointing out these facts of life to everyone
This topic can be closed, its a misunderstanding, the community has come to the unanimous decision that no scam took place. Thank you all, if you disagree with my ruling fight me bitch :fightpepe:
You can believe as you wish.. no need to be rude. I don’t give a shit that he tried to scam me tbh. I’m more along the lines warning others
Oh shit, I wasn't trying to be rude - I wasn't referring to you specifically when I said fight me bitch, it was just kinda like a no-more-debate statement and it went for anyone who wanted to argue that this "scam" happened. Literally NOTHING HAPPENED. AT ALL.
Your screenshot shows a Discord conversation in DMs of which I have ZERO clue who is supposedly who, or if the person you're talking to is who you claim he is on C.to considering Discord names are very easily changed and faked.
This is your whole entire proof right here and my post is JUST as viable as evidence as that screenshot you sent:
TheBlock09: I know a lot i have 4 years experience in coding and reverse engineering
zDizz: I would think someone on cracked.to that had that much experience would have more than 3 rep and no threads {Yes, because everyone who programs is an active and contributing member of C.to. This is a simple fact of programming, MIT requires 400 reps to graduate}
TheBlock09: also i reverse engineered it here is the proof [link removed because I do not want to type it, we do not know what it was a link to]
zDizz: Lol you think ddosing me is gonna bother me? I have 4g also bruh Lol Dumb ass [I have no clue where that came from, assuming it was the link that triggered the ddos accusations but there is no proof of that, just some text in Discord]
TheBlock09: hows it like in america (very general statement and one that can be said to anyone speaking english on discord with a high likelihood of being correct)
zDizz: Say goodbye to your c.to [Again, don't know where this came from.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Still unsure which one was the aggressor in the situation - it starts with zDizz pretty much calling him a fraud. Then TheBlock09 gives him a link that is supposed to have DDOS'd him? Which sounds kinda .. idk. Unlikely, and then the random statement that zDizz has 4G is somehow relevant but since we are flexing connections just want to point out that I'm on 5G right now

Uh yeah. So this topic can still be closed, unless more proof is incoming that proves the proof as being proof that can be used to prove further clarifying proof that ends up making sense of this whole thing then there is no definitive evidence of any foul play.
Also want to be clear that I am not trying to target you in any way Amcdon, but you have to realize that looking at this from an unbiased spectator's position that there is no evidence of anything at all anywhere in this post. It isn't calling you a liar, but I for one would rather assume someone's innocence until they are PROVEN guilty as opposed to the way society has become accustomed to doing things and cancelling first and retrofitting evidence to fit the decision.