exposing @sloupy | snoopyservices.cc

[13.654]

Scammers Profile Link: @sloupy
Sales Thread: Here
Amount or Item(s) Scammed: 10$
Screenshots of Communication: will send to any admin coz it has the method in it. but order info is here 
https://cdn.pipin.dev/image_2026-01-03_03-40-35.png
https://cdn.pipin.dev/image_2026-01-03_03-42-53.png

i can send whole chat export to admins on request.

Additional Information:  my guy thinks its good to sell public methods claims that he sells em on fb,ig so they dont know this method but advertise it here. i clearly asked if its this provider then he ghosted me. i bought that stuff from his site turns out its the same exact site that i've mentioned to him. this guy is totally braindead watch him reply. makes excuses "im student and i have to pay my study no need to do that for me" 
Crypto address for a refund: just ban him bro fr now watch him reply i will refund or defend that its private method ( here is the proof of its being public: https://cdn.pipin.dev/image_2026-01-03_03-44-44.png there is like 6 pages worth of same site here )

[1]

System bot message: @sloupy (sloupy) has been notified about this dispute via private messages and has 24hours to reply in this thread

 

Taking care of cracked.sh's leechers. Every day.
If you have a question regarding your leeching level, click here.

[13.654]

hes clearing the chat one by one :( i feel bad for him. i've exported the chat multiple times & have screen recording aswell. 

[63]

Hello Admin Team,
 
I would like to clarify a dispute raised by a buyer concerning a claimed similarity between one of my methods and content found on a forum.
 
Please consider the following points:

1. At the time of sale, I was not aware that a similar method had been posted on any forum.
   I did not source this method from forums, nor did I knowingly sell publicly available content.
   
2. The product sold was not limited to a single method.It included three methods in total, and after verifying, two of them are exclusive, original, and do not exist on any forum or public source.
   
3. I sell my products on multiple platforms, not only on this forum.
   Therefore, it is incorrect to assume that the method originated from Cracked or any single forum, and I have no control over what third parties may post publicly.
   
4. Similarity does not automatically imply plagiarism or forum sourcing.
   Methods can be independently discovered or later shared publicly without my involvement.
   
5. The buyer received exactly what was advertised and paid for.
   There was no missing content, misrepresentation, or false claim in the sales thread.
   

Based on these facts, the accusation that the product was taken from a forum is inaccurate. I respectfully ask that this context be considered when reviewing the report.
 
Thank you for your time and understanding.

---

hes clearing the chat one by one :( i feel bad for him. i've exported the chat multiple times & have screen recording aswell. 

The issue has already been clarified. The product was delivered as described, and continuing to repeat the same accusation will not help your case.

[13.654]

Hello Admin Team,
 
I would like to clarify a dispute raised by a buyer concerning a claimed similarity between one of my methods and content found on a forum.
 
Please consider the following points:

1. At the time of sale, I was not aware that a similar method had been posted on any forum.
   I did not source this method from forums, nor did I knowingly sell publicly available content.
   
2. The product sold was not limited to a single method.It included three methods in total, and after verifying, two of them are exclusive, original, and do not exist on any forum or public source.
   
3. I sell my products on multiple platforms, not only on this forum.
   Therefore, it is incorrect to assume that the method originated from Cracked or any single forum, and I have no control over what third parties may post publicly.
   
4. Similarity does not automatically imply plagiarism or forum sourcing.
   Methods can be independently discovered or later shared publicly without my involvement.
   
5. The buyer received exactly what was advertised and paid for.
   There was no missing content, misrepresentation, or false claim in the sales thread.
   

Based on these facts, the accusation that the product was taken from a forum is inaccurate. I respectfully ask that this context be considered when reviewing the report.
 
Thank you for your time and understanding.

Good ai shit.

at that time when product was delivered i got only 1 method. then when i said its public method he immediately sent a new method that requires application which most ppl would know. i have whole chat exported dont try to make it up.

here is the method that i got  Search Result 6 pages of result. do some R&D before launching shit my g

its paywithmoon and then he sent me with bank of america shit which i didn't ask for. this doesn't justify you had it on your shop and listed here so yeah prolly you do know but no one asked for it. 

i've been with paywithmoon since 2018 and had acc and balance before they even shutdown. 

all those statements you made with AI proved nothing 

[63]

I will not engage with insults or speculation.
 
The listing stated that the product includes multiple methods.
All methods were delivered as part of the same purchase, and no content was withheld or misrepresented.
Whether the buyer personally knew one method beforehand, or whether a similar concept exists publicly, does not invalidate the product or the delivery.
 
I have already provided a clear explanation to the admin team and have nothing further to add.

[13.654]

@Alex i've sent all the proofs check pms

Here is the screenie

---

I will not engage with insults or speculation.
 
The listing stated that the product includes multiple methods.
All methods were delivered as part of the same purchase, and no content was withheld or misrepresented.
Whether the buyer personally knew one method beforehand, or whether a similar concept exists publicly, does not invalidate the product or the delivery.
 
I have already provided a clear explanation to the admin team and have nothing further to add.

"i will not engage with insults" 

check this out lol 

[63]

I want to clarify that a comment I made was said in frustration and was inappropriate. I apologize for that and it wasn’t my intention to disrespect anyone.
I’d appreciate if the issue is reviewed based on the facts of the transaction and product delivery, which I’ve already explained above.