Additional Information:I am reporting a scam involving a tool named OAK, which I purchased through a marketplace listing. After my purchase, I was directed to join their official channel, where it was announced that OAK was shutting down and transitioning users to a new checker tool named FAK.
Initially, I purchased a 1-day plan on FAK. The tool experienced some technical issues, but the support team provided me with extra usage to compensate for the downtime, which at that time was handled professionally.
Later, I purchased a 7-day plan. During this period, multiple users informed me that FAK might be embedding stealers/malware within their checker. Out of concern, I directly contactedhim via chat and asked if there was any such malicious activity involved. The person I spoke with responded, "yes " idk in which way, indirectly acknowledging its possibility.
Subsequently, a new person was promoted to an admin position within their chat group. This individual openly began advertising the sale of hits. In response to his suspicious activities, I commented:
Quote:"Keep stealing, show when you cracked these."
Shortly after my comment, my license was revoked and I was informed that no refund would be provided.
At the time, I was unaware that this newly promoted admin was actually the owner operating under an alternate account. After this incident, I reached out to Tharwat, who was previously involved in support, asking him to intervene, restore my access, or provide a resolution. Tharwat dismissed my request by stating I should contact the person involved. When I pointed out that this person's username was never listed in any official posts, Tharwat admitted that he is also the second owner operating on an alternate account.
Since then, both owners have been ignoring my messages and have refused to provide any form of refund or resolution. Key Points:
Nowhere in their Terms of Service (TOS) is it stated that asking questions or commenting about suspicious activity is a violation warranting license termination.
I was misled by both owners who used multiple accounts to hide their identities.
My account was terminated in retaliation for raising concerns about possible malicious activity.
They are refusing to engage in further communication or provide a refund.
I feel harassed and deceived through their conduct and refusal to address the issue properly.
I am therefore requesting a full refund of my 7-day plan purchase, and I no longer wish to use any of their services due to the harassment, deception, and unprofessional behavior I have faced.
Crypto address for a refund: ltc1q6789rukmn7emxchv2wa2cdgtc8nh70kwkj5ucn
@Leechometer
This is a bump
[TOP SPOT] Ad by @Hacklink - Until 10.08 CLICK HERE TO PURCHASE THIS AD SPOT AND ADVERTISE YOUR BUSINESS
[BOTTOM SPOT] Ad by @PureDrop - Until 22.07 Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with any of the ads shown above. They're paid advertisements. Please make sure to confirm via PM before contacting me. I do not sell, buy or exchange anything. Be careful of impersonators & scammers.
14 June, 2025 - 09:57 AM(This post was last modified: 14 June, 2025 - 09:58 AM by COD0.)
Reply
022 1. Misattribution – Tharwat Was Not Involved
The report falsely includes Tharwat, who had no role in this case. I, C1D, am the only person behind AK and OAK, and I handled everything directly.
2. False Refund Claim – License Had Only 2 Days Left
The user is demanding a full 7-day refund, despite using the license for 5 full days. Only 2 days were left when I revoked it. This is dishonest and shows bad intent.
3. Service Was Delivered and Supported
The tool was fully operational for most of the license period. I personally helped the user, fixed his issues, and even compensated him when needed.
4. I Was Always Transparent About My Identity
I clearly identified myself as C1D, the second admin. Customers in the group chat know this well. Nothing was hidden or misleading.
5. No TOS Exists – No Violation Happened
There is no official Terms of Service for AK/OAK. Despite that, I have always treated users with fairness and respect — until that respect was broken.
6. User Twisted a Joke into a False Accusation
The user asked Tharwat sarcastically if the checker had a stealer. Tharwat replied jokingly with "yeah". The user took that out of context and repeated it multiple times in public to stir panic.
If someone joked on cracked.io about logging IPs and giving them to the FBI, would you treat that as fact? Of course not.
7. I Helped the User Many Times – Until He Crossed the Line
I gave discounts, fixed bugs, compensated for downtime, and always treated the user respectfully.
But when he started throwing public accusations, mocking me, and questioning my integrity, I had every right to revoke his license — and I did.
8. Disrespect and Harassment Justified My Action
The user wrote things like “Keep stealing, show when you cracked these.” and accused me of stealing his hits with no proof.
I’ve never had to revoke any customer’s license before — but I will not tolerate attacks on my name or character.
9. My Track Record and Community Speak for Me
Over 350 customers, with 200+ active users — and not one has ever accused me of malware or unprofessionalism. The community knows who I am and how I operate.
? Final Statement:
This is not a scam. The user received and used the service, then disrespected me and falsely accused me in public. His refund request is rejected. I will not be issuing any refund under these circumstances.
OP14 June, 2025 - 10:52 AM(This post was last modified: 14 June, 2025 - 11:25 AM by JohnWickX. Edited 7 times in total.)
Reply
1. Tharwat Was Involved — Misattribution Claim is False
I first discovered OAK directly through Tharwat’s advertisements and posts on marketplace.
After purchasing OAK, I was directed to join their official channel — operated and moderated by Tharwat.
It was Tharwat’s channel that officially announced OAK was shutting down and users would be moved to the new tool, FAK.
Tharwat handled sales, support, onboarding, and directly stated that C1D was the “second owner” at the time.
These facts prove that Tharwat was not only involved but was actively operating as a primary owner, promoter, and support contact.
Denying Tharwat’s involvement at this point is completely false and factually inaccurate.
2. Refund Amount — License Was Revoked Unfairly
While I had used 5 of the 7 days, my license was revoked not because of any rule violation or disrespect, but because I raised legitimate concerns about potential malicious behavior.
My public comment was not harassment — I simply asked for clarification and transparency:
As a paying customer raising security concerns, I expected a clear and professional response. If the seller felt my comment was inappropriate, a warning or clarification would have been the reasonable approach — not immediate license revocation.
The revocation was excessive, unprofessional, and retaliatory. I never violated any disclosed rule or policy.
3. Prior Support Does Not Excuse Retaliation
I acknowledge that early technical support was provided.
The compensation you offered was only applied to the checker tool, Other services I purchased — such as the one-day unlimited proxy plan — were completely unusable and provided no value
However, prior support does not justify the unprofessional conduct when I raised valid concerns.
Retaliating against a customer for asking reasonable questions is not acceptable business practice. 4. Lack of Transparency — Ownership Was Hidden
There was never any public disclosure in the channel announcements or official posts that C1D was owner operating under separate accounts.
Customers, including myself, were led to believe they were interacting with separate individuals.
While C1D claims that customers in the group chat "knew this well", I had only recently joined the channel after purchasing the service.
As a new customer, I had no prior knowledge of these identities or any long-term community discussions.
Expecting new users to somehow gather this information from group chat history or indirect conversations is completely unreasonable and reflects a lack of transparency in the way ownership was presented. 5. Absence of Terms of Service Proves My Point
The fact that no official Terms of Service existed makes their actions entirely discretionary.
There were no stated rules prohibiting me from asking questions or expressing concerns.
Revoking a license under these circumstances was arbitrary and purely retaliatory.
6. The "Joke" Excuse is Not Credible
When I asked directly about potential stealers/malware, I received the response:
Quote:“yes"
Labeling this as a "joke" after the fact is disingenuous.
Security-critical tools require serious, professional responses — not vague, dismissive answers that create more suspicion.
Your comparison to someone joking on cracked.io about logging IPs and giving them to the FBI is completely misplaced.
If a user directly asks cracked.io admins or staff members a serious question regarding security, privacy, or data handling — they would not simply laugh it off, refuse to clarify, or immediately ban the person for asking.
Instead, responsible admins would either:
provide a clear answer,
deny the accusation professionally,
or issue a warning if the manner of questioning was inappropriate.
Immediate bans or revocations without any clarification or warning — especially when no TOS violation exists — would be seen as abuse of power.
7. My Comments Were Legitimate Concerns — Not Harassment
My comment was made after observing questionable behavior: openly selling hits, unclear data sourcing, and multiple concerns shared by other users.
I raised my concern only once, after seeing public hit selling being promoted, which naturally triggered serious doubts.
Raising public concerns under such circumstances is fully justified. I never engaged in personal attacks or harassment — only "reasonable questions and concerns" any responsible customer would raise.
I never repeated accusations, harassed you, or attacked your character multiple times.
8. Reputation Argument is Irrelevant to My Case
The claim that no other customers complained does not invalidate my experience or evidence.
i asked about stealer a week ago and did not do anything after that , only raised concern when hit selling was posted
I only raised my concerns after suspicious activity started — specifically when hit selling was openly advertised. Before that, I had no conflict or issues with the service.
My concerns were based on observable behavior and growing community concerns, not any personal agenda.
Every case must be judged on its facts and evidence — prior positive experiences of others do not erase what happened in my situation.
Summary
Tharwat was fully involved in sales, advertising, onboarding, and support for both OAK and FAK.
My license was revoked purely in retaliation for raising valid security concerns.
No Terms of Service existed that prohibited my actions.
Ownership and control were intentionally hidden behind multiple accounts.
I acted professionally and responsibly; their response was retaliatory and deceptive.
9. Community Track Record Goes Both Ways
You claim your community reputation speaks for you. But my track record also speaks for me.
I have been selling actively on Cracked and other marketplaces for over 3 years with 2000+ total customers and 50+ regular recurring buyers.
Throughout this period, I’ve received no complaints, no disputes, and no bad reviews — consistently providing professional, fair service and maintaining respectful relationships with all my customers.
If I was acting maliciously or unfairly, this would have shown in my own long-standing reputation. My clean record shows I have no history of false accusations, harassment, or bad faith behavior.
14 June, 2025 - 01:39 PM(This post was last modified: 14 June, 2025 - 01:42 PM by COD0.)
Reply
Tharwat’s Role Was Support-Based, Not Decision-Making
You discovered OAK through Tharwat — that’s true. He helped with support, announcements, and onboarding.
But the license revocation and refund denial came directly from me, C1D, the sole owner and operator. Tharwat never made that decision, nor was he responsible for how the situation was handled.
License Was 70% Used – No Refund Is Justified
You used 5 out of 7 days of your license — then disrespected us publicly with baseless accusations.
You’re not entitled to a full refund after that. The license was revoked for cause, not as retaliation.
You had your value — you don’t get to demand a refund after that.
Ownership Was Never Hidden — You Just Didn’t Ask
Customers active in our group have always known I operate as C1D and handle development.
We don’t owe new users a pinned announcement about who's who — this is a cracking forum, not a SaaS corporation.
No TOS Doesn’t Equal Unlimited Tolerance
You keep using “no TOS” as if it gives you the right to do or say anything.
It doesn’t. Whether there's a TOS or not, accusing the dev of malware and stealing hits is crossing a line — and consequences followed.
You Know the ‘Yes’ Was Sarcasm — And You Weaponized It
The “yes” response was an obvious joke — and instead of confirming or clarifying, you turned it into screenshots, contextless posts, and public accusations.
That’s not security concern — that’s malicious intent.
Your Comment Was Disrespect, Not Inquiry
You said: “Keep stealing, show when you cracked these.”
That is not a request for clarity. That is an accusation. That is personal disrespect. And that is where your access ended.
Reputation Does Matter — 350+ Customers, 0 Issues
You are the first and only customer to ever make these types of claims.
I don’t care how many buyers you have elsewhere — you brought false accusations into my project, and I acted accordingly. No one else ever needed to be removed — you did.
I Don’t Care About Forum Status — I Care About Principle
I haven’t been active on cracked.io in nearly a year. I’m not here to build rep. I’m here to clarify the facts.
I don’t care if I get banned or blacklisted. I won’t compensate. I won’t refund. Not today. Not ever.
I Could Give 10 Full Plans Away Weekly — Your Refund Means Nothing
You think I revoked your license over money?
I’m ready to give 10 random customers free full AK plans weekly and it wouldn’t impact me at all.
This has nothing to do with value — it has everything to do with respect, which you lost when you made those accusations.
? Final Statement:
You got 5 days of usage, support, and compensation — then broke the boundary with false accusations. There will be no refund. No negotiation. No further engagement. Case closed.
I have every right to sell hits or do whatever I want. I sell publicly, nothing about that is against any rule or hidden from users, and I have nothing to hide. I can bring customers from the same chat who will confirm that I’ve sold hits to them multiple times — and no one ever questioned it.
Also, if you truly “did not know” I was an admin, then how did you accuse me of stealing?
If I were just a regular client, how could I possibly be stealing from you?
You accused me because you knew I was admin — which proves you were fully aware of my role from the start.
So either you knew and lied about it, or you made baseless accusations against a regular customer.
Either way, your story doesn’t hold up.
This post is by a banned member (JohnWickX) - Unhide
Tharwat’s Role Was Support-Based, Not Decision-Making
You discovered OAK through Tharwat — that’s true. He helped with support, announcements, and onboarding.
But the license revocation and refund denial came directly from me, C1D, the sole owner and operator. Tharwat never made that decision, nor was he responsible for how the situation was handled.
License Was 70% Used – No Refund Is Justified
You used 5 out of 7 days of your license — then disrespected us publicly with baseless accusations.
You’re not entitled to a full refund after that. The license was revoked for cause, not as retaliation.
You had your value — you don’t get to demand a refund after that.
Ownership Was Never Hidden — You Just Didn’t Ask
Customers active in our group have always known I operate as C1D and handle development.
We don’t owe new users a pinned announcement about who's who — this is a cracking forum, not a SaaS corporation.
No TOS Doesn’t Equal Unlimited Tolerance
You keep using “no TOS” as if it gives you the right to do or say anything.
It doesn’t. Whether there's a TOS or not, accusing the dev of malware and stealing hits is crossing a line — and consequences followed.
You Know the ‘Yes’ Was Sarcasm — And You Weaponized It
The “yes” response was an obvious joke — and instead of confirming or clarifying, you turned it into screenshots, contextless posts, and public accusations.
That’s not security concern — that’s malicious intent.
Your Comment Was Disrespect, Not Inquiry
You said: “Keep stealing, show when you cracked these.”
That is not a request for clarity. That is an accusation. That is personal disrespect. And that is where your access ended.
Reputation Does Matter — 350+ Customers, 0 Issues
You are the first and only customer to ever make these types of claims.
I don’t care how many buyers you have elsewhere — you brought false accusations into my project, and I acted accordingly. No one else ever needed to be removed — you did.
I Don’t Care About Forum Status — I Care About Principle
I haven’t been active on cracked.io in nearly a year. I’m not here to build rep. I’m here to clarify the facts.
I don’t care if I get banned or blacklisted. I won’t compensate. I won’t refund. Not today. Not ever.
I Could Give 10 Full Plans Away Weekly — Your Refund Means Nothing
You think I revoked your license over money?
I’m ready to give 10 random customers free full AK plans weekly and it wouldn’t impact me at all.
This has nothing to do with value — it has everything to do with respect, which you lost when you made those accusations.
? Final Statement:
You got 5 days of usage, support, and compensation — then broke the boundary with false accusations. There will be no refund. No negotiation. No further engagement. Case closed.
I have every right to sell hits or do whatever I want. I sell publicly, nothing about that is against any rule or hidden from users, and I have nothing to hide. I can bring customers from the same chat who will confirm that I’ve sold hits to them multiple times — and no one ever questioned it.
Also, if you truly “did not know” I was an admin, then how did you accuse me of stealing?
If I were just a regular client, how could I possibly be stealing from you?
You accused me because you knew I was admin — which proves you were fully aware of my role from the start.
So either you knew and lied about it, or you made baseless accusations against a regular customer.
Either way, your story doesn’t hold up.
Your Retaliatory Tone Confirms My Claims
Your own words:
Quote:“I don’t care if I get banned or blacklisted. I won’t compensate. Not today. Not ever.”
This shows your decision was driven by personal emotion, not business policy or fairness.
You revoked access out of retaliation for asking valid concerns — without issuing any warning or engaging in a professional dialogue.
Selective Enforcement Proves Personal Bias
Before any of this situation escalated, multiple users in the group chat were openly discussing, buying, and selling hits — and no one was stopped or warned for doing so.
However, when I replied to someone mentioning that I had hits available, I was immediately told by him on alt acc that "promotions aren’t allowed."
I responded:
Quote:“This guy hates me.”
— because it was clear that rules were only enforced when I posted.
This selective enforcement shows you held personal bias against me even before my comment, and further proves I was not fully aware of your ownership role at that time — but you personally targeted me from the start.
![[Image: blgL61y.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/blgL61y.gif)
![[Image: animated-gif-animation-gif-banner-web-ba...le-ads.gif]](https://i.ibb.co/Tqt4chbY/animated-gif-animation-gif-banner-web-banner-animated-banner-Google-ads.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2Fv1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExMjU1ZjE2YTczODAxYmIxMDkyMTQ3MzU5MGFiMTEwYjY2NjMwYzk3ZiZjdD1n%2FqDUK9FfDf4uEJl8gRy%2Fgiphy.gif)
