OP 14 August, 2025 - 12:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 26 August, 2025 - 04:51 PM by Kermode. Edited 7 times in total.)
This post is by a banned member (H3X) - Unhide
14 August, 2025 - 11:04 AM
(This post was last modified: 23 August, 2025 - 01:10 AM by H3X. Edited 10 times in total.)
My Experience with the Req of VC for this Method
Thought I'd share my experience trying to get a VC for this method. I requested a VC when the thread was new and listed as 0/5 VCs. The seller offered the "basic" version for the vouch but followed up with a pitch to sell me the "premium" version at the basic price. The guy was already trying to make a sale during the vouch process ![]() I told him I'd just take the basic version for review. I mean, who pays for a product that has zero vouches and is completely unproven? ![]() also told him that if the "basic" version is just a tactic to push an upsell to "premium," or if your method is LQ and just smth you threw together to make a quick buck, I would rather not take the VC than leave a negative review later. After those messages, the seller never opened the chat again. ![]() ![]() a classic move to filter out anyone who might give honest (and not necessarily positive) feedback. ![]() Handling a potential voucher like this just screams LQ seller. I'm pulling back the rep I previously gave him. I also noticed the thread is now updated to "5/5 VCs given out," even though I was likely the first to ask and got nothing. The only vouch currently on record also appears to be from one of the seller's friends. and get this, seller posted the usernames of ppl who got a VC… which kinda proves my point already; Like, imagine skipping a Heaven member just to hand the vouch out to some safe picks who haven’t even reached 100 likes. Anyway, I think the picture is pretty clear. ![]() Been here for years; a seller's conduct tells you everything about the product's quality. ![]() Ultimately, I cleared our chat and decided to skip this VC entirely. My advice to anyone curious about the seller’s advertising: : Proceed With Caution. Attached
Update : (23.08.2025)
Pattern Confirmed! Thanks to @HeiCoardo , another reputable member, for coming forward. A second, identical experience leaves no room for doubt. (22 August, 2025 - 11:26 PM)HeiCoardo @HeiCoardo' Wrote: Show More We've all seen enough to know exactly what we're looking at here.
This post is by a banned member (BooneysBets) - Unhide
15 August, 2025 - 03:22 AM
Good luck with sales
This post is by a banned member (Kermode) - Unhide
Bumped
#4
OP 15 August, 2025 - 02:36 PM
This is a bump
This post is by a banned member (NightCEO) - Unhide
15 August, 2025 - 05:26 PM
Huge Vouch For Kermode & this method. I have known this guy for multiple years now & every method he shared with me or I have purchased is fire .
He shared this method with me 2 years ago and we have made insane profits. He asked me to leave a vouch and there is not a thing I wouldn't do for him since he introduced me to some nice money. The best thing about this is that it can be completely autopilot once you set everything up and do everything correctly. I am attaching some of my earnings below. They are 1-2 years old as I have not been focusing on this method anymore & I have since started many legal, legit businesses and put my focus towards those projects. This method however can not be saturated & if anything this era is the best time to do this method in my opinion, right now you have many more resources to make money with this than 2 years ago for example. Big vouch! Always my favorite seller & person! ![]() ![]()
This post is by a banned member (Kermode) - Unhide
Bumped
#7
OP 17 August, 2025 - 08:41 PM
This is a bump
|
Create an account or sign in to comment | ||
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment | ||
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
|
or |
Sign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)